Another "copyright" talk

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-05-2010, 03:47 PM
  #51  
Administrator
 
patricej's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southeast Georgia, USA
Posts: 9,118
Default

the first half of her statement is correct and reasonable.

the second half just cracks me up. :XD:
patricej is offline  
Old 05-05-2010, 06:32 PM
  #52  
Super Member
 
Gramof6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,357
Default

Hmmmmm wonder where she obtained her ideas & concepts? LMBO
Gramof6 is offline  
Old 05-05-2010, 06:44 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pacific NW USA
Posts: 883
Default

Originally Posted by amandasgramma
This is what she says on her blog:

".....THE USE OF CONCEPTS/IDEAS FROM THIS SITE ARE RESTRICTED TO PERSONAL USE ONLY. CONCEPTS/IDEAS MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED FOR SALE.
THANK YOU."
:lol:
This is merely an example of Freedom of Speech rather than Copyright Infringement! It is funny though.
AtHomeSewing is offline  
Old 05-05-2010, 07:43 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 351
Default

You cannot change something "a little" and call it your own.
If you can still recognize any part of it as someone elses,
then it is still not your design. You must change it so it
is not recognizable at all from the original design.
I'm a tole painter and I use several artists designs. 99% of
the artists tell you you can use their patterns for fun or
profit, but it may not be reproduced by a manufacturer. I
assume this applies to copyrighted quilt patterns also. I also
personally think its a little hard to copyright a quilt square
that was created back in the 1800's or earlier. Just changing
its name does not make it yours.
You cannot copyright ideas or concepts unless you have used
them yourself to create something. Does that make sense??
Catlady
Catlady is offline  
Old 05-05-2010, 08:29 PM
  #55  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
amandasgramma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: La Pine Oregon, USA
Posts: 5,907
Default

Exactly -- I don't know if the woman that has that blog is on this forum.....but if she is, I hope she understands how inane her "copyright" statement is!!!!
amandasgramma is offline  
Old 05-05-2010, 09:42 PM
  #56  
Super Member
 
tooMuchFabric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,243
Default

Originally Posted by PatriceJ
Originally Posted by Norene B
Changing the design a little makes it yours. The main thing is not to sell that pattern to someone else. You can make items and sell them though.
sorry, but no it does not.
Correct, this is not true. If the thing is still "recognizable," such as for instance copying a "lookalike but different Mickey Mouse," then it is not original. So changing a little bit does not make it original.

On the other hand, just because someone says their pattern is original and copyrighted does not make it truly original and copyrighted. Maybe they "borrowed" someone's idea. They have to prove it is original, as much as you might have to prove it is not.
tooMuchFabric is offline  
Old 05-05-2010, 09:51 PM
  #57  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: currently central new jersey
Posts: 8,623
Default

i'll never understand this stuff. if it's old, if people have been doing it before you came along, how can it be yours? because you wrote it down? give me a break!
i still don't understand how anyone can 'own' the unmentionable 'dear jane', made of blocks from the 1800's by a long-dead lady.

if i come out of the ladies' room with my skirt stuck into the back of my panties, can i copyright? 'cause you know that it'll happen to someone else soon.
(not a pretty picture, though)
butterflywing is offline  
Old 05-05-2010, 10:06 PM
  #58  
Super Member
 
tooMuchFabric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,243
Default

[quote=butterflywing]if it's old, if people have been doing it before you came along, how can it be yours? because you wrote it down? give me a break!
i still don't understand how anyone can 'own' the unmentionable 'dear jane', made of blocks from the 1800's by a long-dead lady.[quote]

The DJ quilt, as with all old/vintage/antique quilts, is owned by someone, maybe a museum, possibly a person.
So they have the rights to it that way.

But the instructions for reproducing the old blocks and the old quilt are copyrighted by the person who wrote them out, even though it comes decades/centuries later.

I suspect more than one person can make up instructions on how to reproduce something that is already old, and both be within their rights to copyright THEIR set of instructions.

You are right, it is very complicated!
tooMuchFabric is offline  
Old 05-05-2010, 11:58 PM
  #59  
Administrator
 
patricej's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southeast Georgia, USA
Posts: 9,118
Default

Originally Posted by butterflywing
i still don't understand how anyone can 'own' the unmentionable 'dear jane', made of blocks from the 1800's by a long-dead lady.
(not a pretty picture, though)
the quilt itself is not under copyright. however "Dear Jane" as it applies to the quilt is a registered trademark.

there are fabrics licensed under the trademark. the print designs for those fabrics are protected.

the books, software, and other associated commercial products are protected by either trademark, copyright, patent or some combination thereof.

you can make your own replica of Jane Stickle's quilt without buying any of the commercially available products.

however, i don't think many of us would even know the quilt existed without the research and resulting efforts that went into the book and follow-on products. it's also a giant pain in the butt to draft replica blocks. the book and software are reasonably priced. they make it much easier to recreate the quilt. give the author her "props". she is not a villain.
patricej is offline  
Old 05-06-2010, 10:38 AM
  #60  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: currently central new jersey
Posts: 8,623
Default

okay then, got that. now, if i look at the pictures of the blocks and i decide to call it dear janet, and i write instructions my own way, is that allowed, then? or is that still infringement? can i be successfully sued if the instructions are different? does she own the rights to the pictures? not that i'm doing it. just trying to understand the fine points.
butterflywing is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigsister63
Main
120
06-23-2013 06:32 PM
GrandmaSewNSew
Main
40
02-24-2013 04:56 AM
susie-susie-susie
Main
4
05-28-2012 06:07 AM
danmar
General Chit-Chat (non-quilting talk)
21
06-07-2010 12:27 PM
barnbum
Main
25
07-19-2008 05:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



FREE Quilting Newsletter