Good Grief no wonder we marched in the streets.
10-08-2010, 01:50 PM
#121
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: WV, USA
Posts: 748
Originally Posted by PatriceJ
please do not exploit this topic as an opportunity to preach politics or religion. we'll be forced to either lock or delete it.
10-08-2010, 02:20 PM
#122
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southeast Georgia, USA
Posts: 9,124
Originally Posted by Lady Shivesa
Originally Posted by PatriceJ
please do not exploit this topic as an opportunity to preach politics or religion. we'll be forced to either lock or delete it.
there are many pages to this topic ... lots of shoes for lots of folks to try on. if some fit, we'll pretend we didn't notice and just go back to having fun. ;-)
10-08-2010, 03:23 PM
#123
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: 53 degrees North
Posts: 1,679
Can you explain that please?
Are you objecting to the fact that two people (including me) made pretty mild comments about some churches having done some damage in terms of women's rights within relationships? Neither of us made any futher negative comment about religion.
Or are you objecting to the (very many more) people who came on here making biblical quotes and being generally more pro-religion in their posts?
I really want to understand exactly what the policy is on here about this.
I have already explored by PM with Admin what exactly the "religion is off topic" rule means, given so many people make pro-religious comments on here every day.
As mederator, perhaps you can illuminate the board policy in this area?
Thanks
Are you objecting to the fact that two people (including me) made pretty mild comments about some churches having done some damage in terms of women's rights within relationships? Neither of us made any futher negative comment about religion.
Or are you objecting to the (very many more) people who came on here making biblical quotes and being generally more pro-religion in their posts?
I really want to understand exactly what the policy is on here about this.
I have already explored by PM with Admin what exactly the "religion is off topic" rule means, given so many people make pro-religious comments on here every day.
As mederator, perhaps you can illuminate the board policy in this area?
Thanks
10-08-2010, 03:45 PM
#124
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southeast Georgia, USA
Posts: 9,124
i'm frankly surprised it needs clarification.
i don't object to anybody's religious views. ok. except for the nut over there worshipping a potato chip. but ... i digress.
we shouldn't be dragging religion into any conversation here in any way, shape or fashion ... whether it be pro or anti.
the same goes for politics and all variants thereof.
we are thousands, from all walks of life, all over the world. none of us has the right to exploit this board as an opportunity to foist their views on others.
by avoiding it altogether, we don't have to widdle and twiddle over shades and degrees.
i don't object to anybody's religious views. ok. except for the nut over there worshipping a potato chip. but ... i digress.
we shouldn't be dragging religion into any conversation here in any way, shape or fashion ... whether it be pro or anti.
the same goes for politics and all variants thereof.
we are thousands, from all walks of life, all over the world. none of us has the right to exploit this board as an opportunity to foist their views on others.
by avoiding it altogether, we don't have to widdle and twiddle over shades and degrees.
10-08-2010, 03:50 PM
#125
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 9,295
Originally Posted by PatriceJ
i'm frankly surprised it needs clarification.
i don't object to anybody's religious views. ok. except for the nut over there worshipping a potato chip. but ... i digress.
we shouldn't be dragging religion into any conversation here in any way, shape or fashion ... whether it be pro or anti.
the same goes for politics and all variants thereof.
we are thousands, from all walks of life, all over the world. none of us has the right to exploit this board as an opportunity to foist their views on others.
by avoiding it altogether, we don't have to widdle and twiddle over shades and degrees.
i don't object to anybody's religious views. ok. except for the nut over there worshipping a potato chip. but ... i digress.
we shouldn't be dragging religion into any conversation here in any way, shape or fashion ... whether it be pro or anti.
the same goes for politics and all variants thereof.
we are thousands, from all walks of life, all over the world. none of us has the right to exploit this board as an opportunity to foist their views on others.
by avoiding it altogether, we don't have to widdle and twiddle over shades and degrees.
10-08-2010, 06:13 PM
#126
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,357
Originally Posted by Chasing Hawk
Originally Posted by PatriceJ
i'm frankly surprised it needs clarification.
i don't object to anybody's religious views. ok. except for the nut over there worshipping a potato chip. but ... i digress.
we shouldn't be dragging religion into any conversation here in any way, shape or fashion ... whether it be pro or anti.
the same goes for politics and all variants thereof.
we are thousands, from all walks of life, all over the world. none of us has the right to exploit this board as an opportunity to foist their views on others.
by avoiding it altogether, we don't have to widdle and twiddle over shades and degrees.
i don't object to anybody's religious views. ok. except for the nut over there worshipping a potato chip. but ... i digress.
we shouldn't be dragging religion into any conversation here in any way, shape or fashion ... whether it be pro or anti.
the same goes for politics and all variants thereof.
we are thousands, from all walks of life, all over the world. none of us has the right to exploit this board as an opportunity to foist their views on others.
by avoiding it altogether, we don't have to widdle and twiddle over shades and degrees.
10-08-2010, 09:05 PM
#127
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: sunny and WARM Tucson, AZ
Posts: 769
This is NOT me, but it sure sounds like my mom.
10-08-2010, 10:30 PM
#128
Power Poster
Join Date: May 2008
Location: MN
Posts: 24,535
Actually, I am still wondering what source the article was from.
I was looking for something like this: Ladies Home Journal, April 1960, page 40, author's name.
I was looking for something like this: Ladies Home Journal, April 1960, page 40, author's name.
10-09-2010, 06:03 AM
#129
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bay Area near San Francisco
Posts: 1,213
Originally Posted by bearisgray
Actually, I am still wondering what source the article was from.
I was looking for something like this: Ladies Home Journal, April 1960, page 40, author's name.
I was looking for something like this: Ladies Home Journal, April 1960, page 40, author's name.
"Housekeeping Monthly 13 May 1955"
10-09-2010, 06:51 AM
#130
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,453
I had a book that had this in it. It was a school "domestic science" text book from the 1960's. Can't say I remember the part about husband staying out all night but as I thought the whole thing was a load of manure it's quite possible that it was. I was a teen in the 60's. When I showed it to my girls in the eighties they roared with laughter and said I was pulling their leg.
A friend gave the book to me for the recipes but this was taught in schools only 50 years ago (OMG that makes me feel ancient.)
A friend gave the book to me for the recipes but this was taught in schools only 50 years ago (OMG that makes me feel ancient.)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
