A new feature I'm considering
01-13-2010, 04:32 PM
#31
Administrator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 459
Originally Posted by lfw045
Personally I think it is redundant in a way......I mean that in a most respectful way. Isn't that what the Search feature is for?
But here is a thought experiment.
If we extend this line of thinking to the extreme, a question arises. Why do we need sections at all? Why not just dump all topics into one giant section? As a matter of fact, we can remove all sections at all and only leave the Recent Topics listing and the Search page.
For some people it would be OK. I'm sure there are users who only look at the recent topics list and don't wander off into the sections at all.
Yet, it's obvious that a message board without sections/categories/sub-forums (whatever they are called) wouldn't be a message board.
Now if we reverse it and go to the opposite extreme, we would have a home page with 1,000 sections in it, each one containing just a few topics.
As you can imagine, that wouldn't be good either.
So the idea with virtual sections is simply a way to combine the opposites.
As an added benefit, it would (hopefully) stimulate curiosity.
That's what I like about tag clouds. Just by looking at it, you might get interested in some narrow topic of which you weren't thinking just a minute ago.
With search, you would only find what you are already looking for. If you aren't already thinking about it, you won't find it.
Searching and browsing are two fundamentally different activities.
01-13-2010, 04:33 PM
#32
Administrator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 459
Originally Posted by daisyboo9
once we have this feature we would be able to do a search or an advanced search?
01-13-2010, 04:42 PM
#33
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,688
It's the tag(s) that would send a new thread to a virtual section, is that right? And is it only the original author who can assign the tag(s) to their thread? Or can anyone assign a tag to a thread and send it to their own private virtual sections? And what if the author does not assign a tag to their thread?
01-13-2010, 05:05 PM
#34
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: currently central new jersey
Posts: 8,623
okay. when it's all set up, let me know. that's when i'll find someone who understands it to explain it to me. LOL!
01-13-2010, 05:15 PM
#35
Administrator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 459
I like it - could it just be sub-topics under the main topics area - such as under general a tab for jokes, or cats?
01-13-2010, 05:18 PM
#36
Administrator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 459
it sounds as if it would make things, easier, for us, not harder.
The reason I didn't implement tags is because any specific implementation I thought of seemed like it would be a difficult and awkward system to use.
01-13-2010, 05:20 PM
#37
Administrator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 459
It's the tag(s) that would send a new thread to a virtual section, is that right? And is it only the original author who can assign the tag(s) to their thread? Or can anyone assign a tag to a thread and send it to their own private virtual sections? And what if the author does not assign a tag to their thread?
If everyone is allowed to assign any topic to any virtual section, we would end up with a big mess. And if only authors are allowed to assign their own topics, then no doubt a lot of topics would remain unassigned.
But then, not every topic needs to be assigned in the first place.
01-13-2010, 05:37 PM
#38
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,688
Tags work well for blogs, but I don't think they are a good idea for a message board, especially one the size of this. Between the search function and being able to bookmark threads, it seems tags would not be necessary (just my opinion, of course).
Tags are basically a filing system and, like any filing system, the more people doing the filing and the more people doing the retrieving, the more confusing it gets! Would it maybe be more efficient to refine the capabilities of the search function?
Tags are basically a filing system and, like any filing system, the more people doing the filing and the more people doing the retrieving, the more confusing it gets! Would it maybe be more efficient to refine the capabilities of the search function?
01-13-2010, 05:43 PM
#39
Power Poster
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SW Iowa
Posts: 32,855
Great idea.
01-13-2010, 05:46 PM
#40
Administrator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 459
Tags work well for blogs, but I don't think they are a good idea for a message board, especially one the size of this.
In addition to my reply above about everyone assigning any topic to any section, it could be a good idea to simply limit the creation of new virtual sections on demand.
So if a few people decide they want to "establish" a new virtual section, we would create one and they would be in charge of assigning topics to it.
Maybe that would work.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ButtercreamCakeArtist
Main
36
03-02-2011 05:13 AM
