Originally Posted by Moonpi
False advertising! I'd be very disappointed that he wasn't "just happy to see me".
|
Actually, I have to think that this is only fair for men to have a 'support' garment. I mean, after all, we women have bras that do wonders for some of us - in my case - defying the laws of gravity. I wonder how many men have been disappointed when the bra came off and the truth came out? ( I'm referring to women in general.) And just picture every woman in your town out in public without a foundation garment. What's good for the goose is good for the gander? (I've always wanted to use that phrase but never had a real good opportunity.) Or is it good for the gander is good for the goose?
|
Originally Posted by renee765
Actually, I have to think that this is only fair for men to have a 'support' garment. I mean, after all, we women have bras that do wonders for some of us - in my case - defying the laws of gravity. I wonder how many men have been disappointed when the bra came off and the truth came out? And just picture every woman in your town out in public without a foundation garment. What's good for the goose is good for the gander? (I've always wanted to use that phrase but never had a real good opportunity.) Or is it good for the gander is good for the goose?
|
Originally Posted by butterflywing
Originally Posted by renee765
Actually, I have to think that this is only fair for men to have a 'support' garment. I mean, after all, we women have bras that do wonders for some of us - in my case - defying the laws of gravity. I wonder how many men have been disappointed when the bra came off and the truth came out? And just picture every woman in your town out in public without a foundation garment. What's good for the goose is good for the gander? (I've always wanted to use that phrase but never had a real good opportunity.) Or is it good for the gander is good for the goose?
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:22 AM. |