Bewildered and perplexed on a new machine
#11
Power Poster
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Mableton, GA
Posts: 11,277
![Default](/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Agree with Jingle. Also, I learned to FMQ on a dinky mechanical Brother machine from Costco. It was definitely doable. You are only quilting what's under the needle so there is a lot of rearranging. I tried rolling which was not easy, and then I learned to puddle which is better. I finally upgraded to a Brother PQ1500 which isn't all that expensive in the scheme of things. I recently did a queen sized which was not hard. I started in the middle and rotated the quilt clockwise and there kept getting less and less under the arm of the machine. Also on the dinky machine I always started in the middle and worked out and then it got easier as I progressed.
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 251
![Default](/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Agree with Jingle. Also, I learned to FMQ on a dinky mechanical Brother machine from Costco. It was definitely doable. You are only quilting what's under the needle so there is a lot of rearranging. I tried rolling which was not easy, and then I learned to puddle which is better. I finally upgraded to a Brother PQ1500 which isn't all that expensive in the scheme of things. I recently did a queen sized which was not hard. I started in the middle and rotated the quilt clockwise and there kept getting less and less under the arm of the machine. Also on the dinky machine I always started in the middle and worked out and then it got easier as I progressed.
For those who mentioned to me, it would probably be cheaper to send the tops out. I know your right (especially if I purchased a more expensive machine), but the thing is, I find I really enjoy the free motion quilting. I'm still lousy at it, but I'm getting better, and that makes me happy.
Lets face it. There is nothing practical about quilting these days . People don't do it to save money by using sacks or old clothes for their bedding. Quite the contrary. It is a very expensive hobby. There is something very appealing about quilts, and I enjoy making something I think is pretty.
And like the song, " a girls just gotta have some fun".
![Smile](https://cdn.quiltingboard.com/images/smilies/smile.png)
q
Last edited by Schill93; 07-01-2019 at 06:40 PM.
#13
Power Poster
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Mableton, GA
Posts: 11,277
![Default](/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yes, that's the way I have been doing it. Since you have the Brother PQ 1500 machine, let me ask you a question if you don't mind. The price on those is very appealing right now on Amazon ($539) and I have been tempted, but what it doesn't have that the Juki has is speed control. I have a real pedal problem, as I have bad neropothy in my legs (due to chemo), which makes my feet numb (very little feeling), so I thought the speed control on the Juki would be helpful, especially in light of how fast these machines can go, compared to the one I'm used to using. When using a quilting foot in FMQ, how difficult do you find it to control the speed on the 1500?
For those who mentioned to me, it would probably be cheaper to send the tops out. I know your right (especially if I purchased a more expensive machine), but the thing is, I find I really enjoy the free motion quilting. I'm still lousy at it, but I'm getting better, and that makes me happy.
Lets face it. There is nothing practical about quilting these days . People don't do it to save money by using sacks or old clothes for their bedding. Quite the contrary. It is a very expensive hobby. There is something very appealing about quilts, and I enjoy making something I think is pretty.
And like the song, " a girls just gotta have some fun".![Smile](https://cdn.quiltingboard.com/images/smilies/smile.png)
q
For those who mentioned to me, it would probably be cheaper to send the tops out. I know your right (especially if I purchased a more expensive machine), but the thing is, I find I really enjoy the free motion quilting. I'm still lousy at it, but I'm getting better, and that makes me happy.
Lets face it. There is nothing practical about quilting these days . People don't do it to save money by using sacks or old clothes for their bedding. Quite the contrary. It is a very expensive hobby. There is something very appealing about quilts, and I enjoy making something I think is pretty.
And like the song, " a girls just gotta have some fun".
![Smile](https://cdn.quiltingboard.com/images/smilies/smile.png)
q
#14
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Gaylord, MN
Posts: 3,994
![Default](/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I FMQ my own quilts- all sizes. I have a Janome 6600 that has a 9" harp space. It works for me. Doesn't seem to bother me not seeing in front. One thing that is very helpful is I can set the speed I want so I find a speed that works for me and set the machine at that and go to town. I FMG a baby quilt last night and it took me less than 30 minutes. I wanted a soft quilt and didn't do real close meanders. I enjoy it but it does take practice to find your rhythm that works for you. The hardest part is getting the big quilts sandwiched together but I just think how much I am saving and move ahead. I like to do my own quilts from to finish. It helps if you just take a piece of paper and pencil and play with meandering around. Each time you do a quilt it will get better. Practice, practice. It's not for everyone but give it a try, you might like it. I will post a pix of the baby quilt when I get it bound and labeled. Good luck!
#15
Power Poster
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southern USA
Posts: 16,278
![Default](/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think investing in a great quilting table or table set up would be better then a new machine. I have the Arrow large table and I can quilt a queen size with hardly any drag at all. For king size I use a folding table on the side. I have it back to a wall so no dropping off the table. I bought a LA light stand for overhead lighting. No shadows at all on my sewing space.
#16
Super Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Texas currently
Posts: 1,222
![Default](/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Have you checked out Bailey mid-arm machines? I only know to contact them on the web (I think their business is in Maine). Don't know if they have a table top model or if only the ones needing a frame are available. But they are a lot less money and the one I had worked great.
#17
![Default](/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Have you considered the "Quilt As You Go" method for getting your bigger quilts quilted? You quilt each block or section, then join them. It makes the quilting much more enjoyable with a regular sewing machine.
QAYG With Wide Sashing-- How I Do It (wide sashing)
Quilt As You Go (QAYG) Tutorial (narrow sashing)
QAYG With Wide Sashing-- How I Do It (wide sashing)
Quilt As You Go (QAYG) Tutorial (narrow sashing)
#18
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 251
![Default](/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Have you considered the "Quilt As You Go" method for getting your bigger quilts quilted? You quilt each block or section, then join them. It makes the quilting much more enjoyable with a regular sewing machine.
QAYG With Wide Sashing-- How I Do It (wide sashing)
Quilt As You Go (QAYG) Tutorial (narrow sashing)
QAYG With Wide Sashing-- How I Do It (wide sashing)
Quilt As You Go (QAYG) Tutorial (narrow sashing)
How do you find it time wise, compared to making a quilt the traditional way. I remember someone posting on here about it taking much longer. Is that true? Quilting individual blocks would certainly be a joy and I have thought about that. I always worried about the stability of the blocks at the joining points. That may be a baseless concern.
#19
![Default](/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Have you checked out Bailey mid-arm machines? I only know to contact them on the web (I think their business is in Maine). Don't know if they have a table top model or if only the ones needing a frame are available. But they are a lot less money and the one I had worked great.
#20
![Default](/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No, I haven't tried that yet Sewbizgirl, but I have watched many videos on it and bought a book on it.
How do you find it time wise, compared to making a quilt the traditional way. I remember someone posting on here about it taking much longer. Is that true? Quilting individual blocks would certainly be a joy and I have thought about that. I always worried about the stability of the blocks at the joining points. That may be a baseless concern.
How do you find it time wise, compared to making a quilt the traditional way. I remember someone posting on here about it taking much longer. Is that true? Quilting individual blocks would certainly be a joy and I have thought about that. I always worried about the stability of the blocks at the joining points. That may be a baseless concern.
The blocks are just as stable. With the wide-join method, you insert a strip of batting in those wide sashings. To stabilize those, you need to make sure and quilt on the wide sashings once the blocks are all together. That isn't necessary with the narrow join method.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xsquilter
QB Help Center
3
09-23-2012 04:44 PM
Caroline S
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
21
08-14-2012 05:37 AM