Do you ALWAYS have to "scant" your needle?
#11
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Carroll, Iowa
Posts: 3,503
I use my old Viking D1 and since everything is "scant 1/4" I programmed it and put it in my "favorites" so just go there when I turn my machine on, click on my programmed stitch and the way I go. This machine is 15 years old so I'm sure the newer ones have a way to program the special stitch and save it to the machine. I also use my edge foot instead of my 1/4" to help me keep the edge of the fabric where it needs to be. My hands tremor a lot so need all the help I can get.
#12
What possible difference does it make what your ¼" foot sews or what the seam allowance is...scant, quarter, or something else? The only thing that matters is what's between the seams and that's a moving target depending on the threads (top and bottom) and fabrics (top and bottom) being used at the time of measurement.
Why are we so obsessed with how big the parts that get buried inside our quilts are and all but ignore the size of the parts that show on top?
Why are we so obsessed with how big the parts that get buried inside our quilts are and all but ignore the size of the parts that show on top?
#13
Power Poster
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Southern California
Posts: 19,127
If I want a SCANT, then yes, I move the position over 1 setting. But I seldom need to sew a scant 1/4" seam. I have a Bernina 1530. I also have layers of painter tape for a guide for an accurate 1/4" seam.
#14
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Morris Plains, NJ
Posts: 1,803
What possible difference does it make what your ¼" foot sews or what the seam allowance is...scant, quarter, or something else? The only thing that matters is what's between the seams and that's a moving target depending on the threads (top and bottom) and fabrics (top and bottom) being used at the time of measurement.
Why are we so obsessed with how big the parts that get buried inside our quilts are and all but ignore the size of the parts that show on top?
Why are we so obsessed with how big the parts that get buried inside our quilts are and all but ignore the size of the parts that show on top?
#15
Exactly, but what matters is the inside measurement, not the seam allowance. That's all I was trying to say. Measure with every project (or every time you change the threads/fabrics) and you'll always be accurate no matter what foot you use.
#16
My Janome allows me to store the correct setting in memory and make that the default but I still have to reset when I change to the 1/4" accufeed foot. Have had "heated" discussions with other quilters who insist that the factory setting on their machines is accurate without even checking.
#18
Power Poster
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 11,276
I agree totally. The quarter inch seam is a misnomer because you really don't care about the seam, you care about the resultant patch. It's also a moving target, depending on the thread and fabric combo you use. I'd rather spend 2 minutes at the beginning of each project to determine my needle setting and have everything fit together rather than fighting to get stuff to fit.
#19
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 4,299
I have a 1961 Singer "Rocketeer" that has a perfect scant 1/4" seam with its quarter-inch foot. I think that's the only machine I have that doesn't require adjustment to get that. The foot is an after-market foot, even.
#20
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tippy-top of a ridge in WV
Posts: 6,355
I bought my Brother PQ1500s for FMQing, or any quilting, for that matter and I have many other machines to piece with, but I now find that getting a perfect 1/4" seam is so easy with my 1500, that I am doing almost all of my piecing on it too.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bearisgray
General Chit-Chat (non-quilting talk)
65
02-01-2024 09:04 AM
roselady
Main
60
07-20-2009 08:16 PM