KSue

Hello,
With all the sergers on the market how do you know which one to choose? The easier to use the better it would be for me but I can't afford the $$$$ ones. I am looking in the market of about $300. Would I just be wasting my money for one at that price or should I bite the bullet and get a better quality? I have been sewing more dresses for granddaughters lately and would like something that finishes my seams. Any suggestions?? Thanks for your time.
Ksue

mermaid

There's a Babylock for around $200 and maybe less on line--it has gotten some good reviews and supposed to be very easy to thread. Why don't you search for diff brands and read the reviews as well as the features.

MamaBear61

I have a Janome that I have had for several years now. I think I spent closer to $500 but they still sell for about the same price today. You will not regret owning a serger if you are doing garment sewing. I have been making clothing for my grandkids too and having the serger certainly is a time saver.

emmy

Go to Pattern Review and go through all the reviews. The reviews not only tell you the pros & cons, but what they paid. Their site is wonderful because the comments are from sewers and quilters.

quilter2090

I really like the Brother 1034D serger. It is easy to use and they give a CD to show you how to use the machine. I bought mine for under $300.00. Check it out, you might lilke it.

Holice

Decide what you want to do with the serger and then look for the new features - such as self threading etc. I traded to get the "overlock" I believe that is the term. It is the stitch that is not edge. I especially wanted to hem knit pants. Check out the features first and then decide.

Ginaky

Overlock, or overlocker, is a more British term for a Serger. The normal stitch is an overlock stitch. The stitch used for hems is a coverstitch-if you are talking about the one with 2 straight rows on top and a loopy stitch on the bottom. You can never go wrong with a Babylock serger. I am on my third serger and it's a Juki. It does pretty much everything but talk and I'm still learning it. But for finished seams and rolled edges, a serger is a must! The rolled edge is great for ruffles.

patchsamkim

You may be able to find a good used one for a decent price. My niece is buying mine which has not seen much use at all. Later, if she has more money, and wants one with more features, she should be able to sell it for the same price I am having her pay me, and she can get one with more options.

Dolphyngyrl

Since we are on the topic. I want to start doing clothes, and have been looking at this serger
http://www.allbrands.com/products/26...spool-1hand-2n
Anyone have it, and how do they like it. I didn't see this model on pattern review so I was wondering about it since we are talking sergers.

Mitch's mom

It is the same under the hood as the 1034D. The difference is the extension table, which to me, makes it as big as a sewing machine. I have never had a problem with space to the left of the needle and only rarely to the right of the needle. To me it looks like they are fixing a problem that does not exist.

I have torn a 1034 down to the skeleton. It is all metal with a good motor. It isn't a fancy machine but it is a work horse. The only weakness I saw was a possible problem with cracking of a knob/gear combination in about 20 years. Save yourself 200.00 and buy the 1034D.

Another good serger to check out is the Janome Juno from Hancock Fabric's. It usually is on sale for 189.00. It has the tension knobs on the front instead of lay in tensions like the Brother 1034D. I am a big fan of this machine. I have the same machine as a badged Kenmore. I have used the dog water out of it and it keeps on sewing anything I throw at it within the realm of what I would sew with a serger. I love it for finishing the edges on fleece blankets. I think the tensions are a lot less fussy than the lay in type and definitely easier to release - just turn the knob to '0'. I have had my serger since 2006 and it sews as good today as the day I took it out of the box.