Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums >
  • Main
  • Singer 201 vs Singer 301 - which to buy? (no pics) >
  • Singer 201 vs Singer 301 - which to buy? (no pics)

  • Singer 201 vs Singer 301 - which to buy? (no pics)

    Thread Tools
     
    Old 04-02-2011, 02:36 PM
      #1  
    Super Member
    Thread Starter
     
    montanajan's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Dec 2010
    Location: NW Montana
    Posts: 1,275
    Default

    I recently satisfied my wish for a treadle, got Singer 66 "Red Eye", made in 1922 for a bargain in great shape & am now looking for just 1 more machine.

    I want to put a Singer - same or similar to Mom's old 201-2 - into her art deco cabinet that I have. I've been researching each, & know the 301 is a slant needle & has a carrying handle built in. Handle is a mute point, since I will not be using it as a take-along.

    I'll get a black one, to more closely replicate Mom's than the tan 301's. But aside from that, I really don't know which to search. Ebay & Craig's list offer both.

    Any suggestions on pros & cons of each will be much appreciated. The more I read, the more confused I get - 1 day I want a 15-90, the next a 201 -2, the next a 301. I've already asked re: 15-90 vs 201. Now I'm hearing I should get a 301.

    Each one I pass on ebay makes me think I better hurry & decide. Please Help!

    Thanks to the well-informed people on this site, I hope to receive info to make a sensible choice.
    Happy stitchig,
    Jan
    montanajan
    montanajan is offline  
    Old 04-02-2011, 02:46 PM
      #2  
    Power Poster
     
    dunster's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Mar 2009
    Location: Lake Elsinore, CA
    Posts: 15,182
    Default

    First thing is to check to see whether the 301 will fit in your cabinet. Don't worry about them all disappearing - there are plenty available. Black 301's are harder to find, and you also have to consider whether it's a short bed or long bed. The 301's require a cradle for mounting into a cabinet; the 201 doesn't. They're both very good machines.
    dunster is offline  
    Old 04-02-2011, 03:01 PM
      #3  
    Super Member
     
    thepolyparrot's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Nov 2010
    Location: Mars
    Posts: 2,549
    Default

    The 301 with a short extension will fit into any cabinet that the other mentioned machines will fit into - but you will need a cradle and two latches to attach to the cabinet, first.

    The 301, being slant-needle, will not have the piercing power of a straight-needle machine. It has a vertical bobbin for FMQ, but the bobbin holds much less thread than the class 15 bobbin.

    I love my 301 for portability, but if I could only have one machine of those that you've mentioned, it would be the 15-91, hands down. (The 15-91 is the potted motor version, but the 15-90 that you mentioned is a very close second - it's the same except it's belt-driven and has a bolted-on motor)
    thepolyparrot is offline  
    Old 04-14-2011, 09:54 PM
      #4  
    Super Member
    Thread Starter
     
    montanajan's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Dec 2010
    Location: NW Montana
    Posts: 1,275
    Default

    OK, the quandry is over. I have purchased a nice Singer 201-2. It was 'born' the same year I was, only 1 of the deciding factors in my purchase. It will fit into Mom's old cabinet & is the same model on which I learned to sew as a child. It will arrive in a couple weeks. My sis & I are refinishing the art deco sewing cabinet/writing desk I have that was Mom's. Maybe once the cabinet is finished, I can post a pic. Its going to be fun to sew on an old mechanical machine again, though I will still also use my Babylock Quilter's Choice (nice win at LQS grand opening when they moved to new location). The treadle , Lady Albertina, a 1922 model 66 Red Eye, deserves some time as well - why did I ever think I needed more than one sewing machine?
    How many machines do others of you have in your collection?
    Mine is done growing!
    Jan
    montanajan is offline  
    Old 04-14-2011, 10:01 PM
      #5  
    Power Poster
     
    Annaquilts's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Jul 2010
    Location: SoCal
    Posts: 11,918
    Default

    Congrats on your 201-2. It is the last vintage machine I am still looking for in my collection.
    Annaquilts is offline  
    Old 04-15-2011, 02:25 AM
      #6  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Nov 2009
    Location: Ontario, Canada
    Posts: 1,991
    Default

    All of the machines you mentioned are part of the list of classics. They are all wonderful machines in their own right and all a little different. I suppose it comes down to what you plan to do with it and how much space you have. If $ and space are no problem then collect one of each and play and enjoy your collection! If you want to actually quilt on it either the 201 or the 15-91 have a bigger harp and would probably handle FM quilting much better than a 301. The 301 is a great machine to stitch on but you will have to have the feet and attachments to fit it as it is a high shank slant needle machine and regular feet won't fit. Lots of decisions for you.
    Shelbie is offline  
    Old 04-15-2011, 04:04 AM
      #7  
    Power Poster
     
    Join Date: Feb 2010
    Location: Ohio
    Posts: 17,068
    Default

    Hi Jan,
    Okay here's the deal with me:

    Before I joined the board- my Bernina and my old Kenmore

    Now- The above :) PLUS 2 FW's, 15, 66 Redeye, 201,301 !!!
    Can you tell I'm having fun????

    I never realized how wonderful the old machines are!!
    I want to make my 15 a treadle. That's the only thing I want to buy. (famous last words)
    Have fun with your new girl!!! :D:D
    sueisallaboutquilts is offline  
    Old 04-15-2011, 06:56 AM
      #8  
    Super Member
     
    thepolyparrot's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Nov 2010
    Location: Mars
    Posts: 2,549
    Default

    That's wonderful - congratulations! :)

    You will love piecing with your new 201 - and it does decent free-motion quilting too, so you'll have fun practicing that as well. :thumbup:
    thepolyparrot is offline  
    Old 04-15-2011, 09:47 PM
      #9  
    Super Member
    Thread Starter
     
    montanajan's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Dec 2010
    Location: NW Montana
    Posts: 1,275
    Default

    Yes, I'm having fun going back to the oldies.
    I realize Mom wanted a machine with more functions built in, though she did have many of the Singer optionals (buttonholer, zig zag attachment, zipper foot, hemming feet of various widths, pinking attachment, etc). So she traded away her 201-2 for what she thought was an upgrade to a zig zagging Singer Stylist, & was never as satisfied as she was with the previous old black Singer.
    Mom died 1 1/2 years ago, but I hope she can see me from Heaven & is happy I'll be sewing on a machine again like we grew up using.
    montanajan is offline  
    Old 04-16-2011, 04:13 AM
      #10  
    Power Poster
     
    Join Date: Feb 2010
    Location: Ohio
    Posts: 17,068
    Default

    Jan, I'm sure she is :thumbup:

    I have heard this a lot from other people. My own Mom wasn't much of a sewer and didn't use those attachments much but seems like other people ended up liking their old ones better.
    Have fun :D
    sueisallaboutquilts is offline  
    Related Topics
    Thread
    Thread Starter
    Forum
    Replies
    Last Post
    Kas
    For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
    17
    10-12-2021 10:07 AM
    montanajan
    Main
    27
    03-10-2014 08:22 PM
    Carol34446
    For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
    1
    09-16-2013 10:53 AM
    tatavw01
    Links and Resources
    1
    01-30-2012 09:14 PM
    Mariposa
    Main
    8
    06-15-2011 07:07 PM

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is On
    Trackbacks are Off
    Pingbacks are Off
    Refbacks are Off



    FREE Quilting Newsletter