Why would a pattern have one draw match points if it's all on 1/4" seam?
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,688
![Default](/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The pattern reads "Mark match points on wrong sides of each template patch.... using see-through acyrlic ruler, make cross hairs in corners by drawing a short line 1/4" from each raw edge..." Then of course one matches the points...
BUT--if I'm using an accurate seam allowance why would that step be necessary? I cringed when I read it, then skipped it and the blocks seems to be coming out okay... :wink: (well, except for the knot in the middle, which I have gotten help with :wink: ).
BUT--if I'm using an accurate seam allowance why would that step be necessary? I cringed when I read it, then skipped it and the blocks seems to be coming out okay... :wink: (well, except for the knot in the middle, which I have gotten help with :wink: ).
#4
![Default](/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think it's just a way to assure that the points match. Many quilters have problems keeping an accurate ¼" seam allowance and this method virtually guarantees it. Think about how often the question of non-matching points comes up here. This way would be a HUGE time burden, but very safe. I'd say the pattern maker just wants to guarantee success.
#7
![Default](/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Is this for the octagon block? If it's anything like the construction of kaleidoscopes, if you leave the points on the triangles, you can use those to match your seams. I've never marked the cross points on the fabric.
#8
![Default](/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I agree that it is just another step to insure accuracy. If all else is correct, it ishouldn't be necessary, but not everyone reads directions as well as you do! Most people skip steps and wonder why it didn't work out! :? My SIL looks at the pictures, she doesn't read, and she says she LOVES to sew! :?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
craftybear
Links and Resources
0
06-13-2011 06:59 PM