Joining binding strips
#11
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,867
I'm going with losing 1/2" on each join - the 1/4" seam. I intensely dislike cutting extra as I have too many scraps. At least binding ones are useful. I don't work with less than 2 1/2" scraps and I can't find anyone to take my scraps that are from 1 1/2" to 2 1/2". I guess it's time to pitch them.
#12
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Middlebury, IN
Posts: 1,484
I'm going with losing 1/2" on each join - the 1/4" seam. I intensely dislike cutting extra as I have too many scraps. At least binding ones are useful. I don't work with less than 2 1/2" scraps and I can't find anyone to take my scraps that are from 1 1/2" to 2 1/2". I guess it's time to pitch them.
Last edited by QuiltnNan; 09-10-2019 at 10:46 AM. Reason: PM
#13
Power Poster
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southern USA
Posts: 16,511
If it's a print I join straight across. I stopped doing the angle join unless it's a light color solid. One of the best how-to I got from a very expensive quilt finishing lecture at a National Quilter's Association show.
#14
Power Poster
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 12,861
When I figure my binding needs I measure the 4 sides of the quilt, add 10” then divide by 40” to see how many strips I need. If I need 8.25 I cut 9. I figure it’s always better to have a bit extra left over than to run short.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 540
I must have been at that same lecture onebyone. Bias binding joined straight works just fine and the print can be matched to be uninterrupted if that needs to be. I forgot the lecturer but remember she was a national quilt judge that went all over judging shows.
#16
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Somewhere in Time
Posts: 2,697
I always make a point of cutting extra strips -- just in case. Extra binding strips are sewn together, pressed in half and wound into coils and stored for later use on another project. This has saved me time on several projects. It just takes a little time to cut more strips while I have the fabric setup to cut them.
#19
Super Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,391
[QUOTE=Bobbinalong;8299885]For a diagonal join you will lose a little more than the width of your binding strip.
You will also lose a little binding with the mitres on the corners. Quote]
No you don't lose anything on the corners. The edge of the binding lays on the edge of the quilt and just goes around the corner. There is no fold on the exact corner.
The reason for sewing binding on the diagonal is to reduce bulk. If you make seams straight across, you will have 12 thickness of fabric at that spot, plus the quilt top, back and batt. And that's if you pressed the seam open.
But I don't cut my bindings on the 45º either. I lay the strips on the mat, lined up carefully with the printed lines with one inch of overlap. Then I cut an angle from the corner of the top one to the corner of the bottom one. You can't see the bottom one, but the lines on the mat will tell you where that is. That way I only lose one inch instead of the complete width of the binding.
You will also lose a little binding with the mitres on the corners. Quote]
No you don't lose anything on the corners. The edge of the binding lays on the edge of the quilt and just goes around the corner. There is no fold on the exact corner.
The reason for sewing binding on the diagonal is to reduce bulk. If you make seams straight across, you will have 12 thickness of fabric at that spot, plus the quilt top, back and batt. And that's if you pressed the seam open.
But I don't cut my bindings on the 45º either. I lay the strips on the mat, lined up carefully with the printed lines with one inch of overlap. Then I cut an angle from the corner of the top one to the corner of the bottom one. You can't see the bottom one, but the lines on the mat will tell you where that is. That way I only lose one inch instead of the complete width of the binding.
#20
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,857
I just make it easier on myself (rather than a bunch of math) and I add 3" per join. So you would have needed 24". I know that is too much, but just easier for the old brain! (i think you used so very little because you were calculating your WOF as 40" and it is often 42" or 43", so you already have some wiggle room.)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
craftybear
Links and Resources
3
12-25-2010 09:49 PM