Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums >
  • Main
  • For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
  • Darning Foot for a Kenmore 117-959 >
  • Darning Foot for a Kenmore 117-959

  • Darning Foot for a Kenmore 117-959

    Thread Tools
     
    Old 08-25-2014, 07:56 AM
      #1  
    Member
    Thread Starter
     
    Join Date: Aug 2014
    Location: Haslet, TX
    Posts: 4
    Default Darning Foot for a Kenmore 117-959

    This is my second time to post. I have my grandmother's Kenmore 117-959. It is in great condition (the cabinet, not so much), save for the rigged motor pulley tire (someone fixed it a long time ago with a bobbin tire - I've ordered the correct part). The presser bar was frozen, but I was able to use penetrating oil and patience and get it moving again.

    Once I get the little maintenance things done, I plan to use this machine for making quilts.

    I've ordered about several sets of Greist attachments from ebay - I've wound up with one set that fits, one set that has the smaller top clamp notch, and one set that is a mixture of both sizes of top clamp notches. I think I might have a good representation of a set based on all of these pieces.

    My grandmother's buttonholer was not a top clamping buttonholer. I know she used this because I witnessed its use on many occasions. My mother also used it. I am confused by this because it is not a top clamp attaching thing, it is a side clamping screw thing.

    Anyway, my question: I am looking for a darning/FMQ/embroidery foot. So far, I cannot seem to find one. The quilting attaching with the Greist set appears to be really good for quilting that is not FMQ. The only FMQ feet I can find are side attaching. Does anyone know of a foot good for the purpose of FMQ that will fit on this machine? Would a low shank side clamping foot fit, perhaps there is an adapter? I've searched the forum and google and everywhere else and I just can't find anything other than someone suggesting I change the presser bar to a side clamping presser bar. I'm not sure that is possible, but if it were, I could do, but why.
    SiouxsieQ is offline  
    Old 08-25-2014, 09:28 AM
      #2  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2010
    Location: Outer Space
    Posts: 9,319
    Default

    Is this a rotary model? I've never heard of anyone being successful in FMQing on a rotary machine. I've tried springs and a bunch of different feet and finally gave away the rotary I had. If I can't use a machine for FMQing it's typically out the door...
    Candace is offline  
    Old 08-25-2014, 09:39 AM
      #3  
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: Jul 2014
    Posts: 384
    Default

    how do I know if my machine's a rotary? are singers rotary? I know some have said they fmq on the 15-91 and quilt on the 201 but is the 66 a rotary? and why cant you fmq on a rotary? (I haven't tried it yet but am gearing up to give it a try soon so wanting to prevent any surprises LOL!)
    quilt938 is offline  
    Old 08-25-2014, 12:00 PM
      #4  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2010
    Location: Outer Space
    Posts: 9,319
    Default

    The old rotary machines have side clamping feet, that's the main issue. I've not found a good foot that does decent FMQing on the side clamping machines.
    Candace is offline  
    Old 08-25-2014, 02:14 PM
      #5  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2012
    Posts: 8,091
    Default

    This thread has me confused. "side clamping" feet are basically like the low shank feet.... right?

    The Kenmore 117- 959 is a rotary hook machine. Rotary means the bobbin hook rotates, oscillating means the hook turns half way forward then backs up then repeats very fast.

    Singer 15-91s are oscillating hook machines with a feed dog drop system. That's whey they FMQ.

    As for the darning foot, I don't know of any made for the top clamp feet and that is what the Kenmore 117-959 is. The feet attach with a big nut that clamps them on the shaft.

    The person to ask regarding top clamp feet is MacyBaby. She is the biggest collector and researcher of feet and attachments I know of here on the forum.

    Joe
    J Miller is offline  
    Old 08-25-2014, 04:06 PM
      #6  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2013
    Location: Centralia, WA, USA
    Posts: 4,890
    Default

    By rotary are you thinking White rotary? The 117 model# indicates it's a White made machine. The White machines generally used a buttonholer that was attached directly to the presser bar. The top-clamp adapter was removed and the buttonholer went on in it's place. By your description I think that is what you were seeing.
    I don't know if a darning foot was ever available but if it's like the White I had briefly I would expect it to FMQ. The thread path is similar to a Singer 15.
    Rodney
    Rodney is offline  
    Old 08-25-2014, 05:40 PM
      #7  
    Member
    Thread Starter
     
    Join Date: Aug 2014
    Location: Haslet, TX
    Posts: 4
    Default

    I was hoping to bait MacyBaby, as I've read a lot of what she has to say, which is extremely helpful.

    This is definitely a top-clamping Kenmore rotary. The buttonholer does, in fact, attach directly to the bar, without the top clamp. That lead me to believe it would be possible to attach another type of low shank foot to it that was not necessarily top clamping. I would be willing to try a side clamping foot on it if it is possible to attach one. I mean, I've never FMQ'd before, so it's not like I'll know any better.
    SiouxsieQ is offline  
    Old 08-25-2014, 07:03 PM
      #8  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2010
    Location: Outer Space
    Posts: 9,319
    Default

    Originally Posted by Candace
    The old rotary machines have side clamping feet, that's the main issue. I've not found a good foot that does decent FMQing on the side clamping machines.
    Oops I typed it wrong. I meant top clamping foot.
    Candace is offline  
    Old 08-26-2014, 06:08 AM
      #9  
    Member
    Thread Starter
     
    Join Date: Aug 2014
    Location: Haslet, TX
    Posts: 4
    Default

    Any foot to try would be a great start!
    SiouxsieQ is offline  
    Old 08-26-2014, 08:23 AM
      #10  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2010
    Location: Outer Space
    Posts: 9,319
    Default

    Originally Posted by SiouxsieQ
    Any foot to try would be a great start!

    I don't think there is one that will adequately do FMQing, like I had stated. But if there is one, Macy would know about it. I tried quite a few with no luck.
    Candace is offline  
    Related Topics
    Thread
    Thread Starter
    Forum
    Replies
    Last Post
    KEN
    For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
    4
    10-10-2013 08:00 AM
    ube quilting
    Main
    16
    08-12-2013 02:41 PM
    thomp116
    For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
    7
    02-26-2013 08:14 PM
    Grannyh67
    For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
    20
    02-05-2012 02:31 PM
    Anne
    Main
    3
    02-05-2012 08:40 AM

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are Off
    Pingbacks are Off
    Refbacks are Off



    FREE Quilting Newsletter