Help from Featherweight owners...
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 808
#52
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Victorian Sweatshop Forum
Posts: 4,096
Cari
#54
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 88
This may sound heretical after the above 221 love fest, but you may consider a Singer 301 instead. They only weigh a couple pounds more than a FW and have a built-in carry handle. They also have a very pretty straight stitch and can sew very fast if that is what you want. The prices for 301's are not too bad - significantly lower than 221's.
I have two 221's and sewed my first granddaughter dress on the pristine 1954 one my MIL gifted me. The other one, a 1937 w/o a case, controller, and attachments, was an estate sale find at $50. BTW, I found Two FW folding tables at a Habitat ReStore store for $15 and $17 each at the same time. I have four 301's and really prefer sewing on a full size machine vs. a half-size machine. Just my $0.02 worth.
I have two 221's and sewed my first granddaughter dress on the pristine 1954 one my MIL gifted me. The other one, a 1937 w/o a case, controller, and attachments, was an estate sale find at $50. BTW, I found Two FW folding tables at a Habitat ReStore store for $15 and $17 each at the same time. I have four 301's and really prefer sewing on a full size machine vs. a half-size machine. Just my $0.02 worth.
Last edited by QuiltnNan; 04-06-2019 at 01:13 AM. Reason: shouting/all caps
#55
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Victorian Sweatshop Forum
Posts: 4,096
This may sound heretical after the above 221 love fest, but you may consider a Singer 301 instead. They only weigh a couple pounds more than a FW and have a built-in carry handle. They also have a very pretty straight stitch and can sew very fast if that is what you want. The prices for 301's are not too bad - significantly lower than 221's.
Cari
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hobbykat1955
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
7
06-03-2011 05:35 PM