The Minimal Sewing Studio

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-17-2014, 04:48 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Centralia, WA, USA
Posts: 4,890
Default

I would love to find a 320. My daughter wants a free arm machine but that one I would probably keep for myself.
Rodney
Rodney is offline  
Old 09-17-2014, 05:33 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
KenmoreRulesAll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Puget Sound Region
Posts: 772
Default

Good advice, everyone. I've been watching for a Reece buttonhole machine and found one for around $300. These are amazing machines -- watching them do their thing is a beautiful sight. And I'm thinking a Kenmore zig-zag with all the bells and whistles (like the 18023) plus a free arm machine (Phoenix or Kenmore convertible, not sure) will be great.

I have two 201-2 machines, both in beautiful shape and I bought both of them for such low prices. I hate to part with them, so one might be my straight-stitch. Although the Pfaff 30 is a strong contender. (1.4 amps on a domestic straight stitch can kick some serious tail.) I think the 15-90 and 91 I have are too underpowered.

As for coverstitching and overlocking, I may just hang it all and get a Juki industrial that can do it all -- except keep my domestic 4-thread Bernina/Juki (MO-734DE) for hemming:



**********************
OK, so I just purchased an industrial zig-zag machine about an hour ago. It's an Adler, very worn in but not worn out. I plugged it in, pressed the pedal, and experienced a little bit of heaven. I bought it on the spot. It does single and double needle sewing and has a clutch motor rather than a Servo. That's OK. I can upgrade later if I want.

It comes in an industrial wood topped table (not laminate or other garbage) on a metal frame with a full-function pedal that is throttle, disengages the presser foot lift, and stops on a dime. I love the hand wheel assembly with two wheels controlling the belt feed to the motor drive.

It needs oiling, cleaning, has a little bit of rust here and there but the price was just too good to pass up.
Attached Thumbnails p1010081-640x480-.jpg  
KenmoreRulesAll is offline  
Old 09-17-2014, 06:07 PM
  #13  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 1,572
Default

You don't waste any time! Kenmore 1802 was the model I was trying to think of in my last post- not 82. Has many cams and even monograms.
Monroe is offline  
Old 09-17-2014, 06:18 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
KenmoreRulesAll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Puget Sound Region
Posts: 772
Default

Yeah, I saw the price for the Adler and leapt out of my chair, grabbing my phone and my car keys.

By the time she called me back, 8 other people called her after me, one from Yakima, another from Portland. The machine's in Bellevue(!), only about 20 mins. from my house, lucky me. Now I have to set up a time to go back, disassemble, and haul it away.

The Kenmore 18023 is one of my favorite machines of all time. I love that thing. It would be my catch-all zig-zag machine that is really versatile. I've never monogrammed on it, though I have the attachment.

At some point, I might add an embroidery machine to the fleet. I don't see myself getting into embroidery but watching them work is very cool. But I'd want an industrial, not a home machine. And we're talking around $6-7K.
KenmoreRulesAll is offline  
Old 09-17-2014, 06:45 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
KenmoreRulesAll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Puget Sound Region
Posts: 772
Default

Mike, I've seen great buttonholes made by ordinary straight stitch machines but I've never been able to produce anything I'd want on a finished garment. (Operator error, of course. ) I don't mind having a machine set up just for buttonholing but you may be right: a straight stitch is the way to go.
KenmoreRulesAll is offline  
Old 09-17-2014, 06:52 PM
  #16  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Centralia, WA, USA
Posts: 4,890
Default

Just watching the buttonholer work on a straight stitch machine is fun and you end up with a really nice buttonhole. I haven't tried actually making anything with buttons yet though.
Rodney
Rodney is offline  
Old 09-17-2014, 07:40 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Victorian Sweatshop Forum
Posts: 4,096
Wink

[QUOTE=KenmoreRulesAll;6893235]
I have two 201-2 machines, both in beautiful shape and I bought both of them for such low prices. I hate to part with them, so one might be my straight-stitch. Although the Pfaff 30 is a strong contender. (1.4 amps on a domestic straight stitch can kick some serious tail.) I think the 15-90 and 91 I have are too underpowered.

KRA,
If you think the 15-91 is underpowered, you'll experience the same with a 201-2. They have the exact same motor, they're interchangeable. Rated .5 or .6 amp, can't remember which.
Now, I may be writing a check my butt can't cash but I'll put my 1 amp Selectomatic up against your pfaff 30 for power. That machine amazed me. Went through 16 layers of cotton with a size 12 needle just like it was 2 layers. The only reason I didn't try to go thicker was I couldn't fold the fabric any more.

Cari
Cari-in-Oly is offline  
Old 09-17-2014, 09:03 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
KenmoreRulesAll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Puget Sound Region
Posts: 772
Default

The 201-2 and 15-91 have either the .53 or the .6. Both my 201s and my 91 have the .6. But I'd only need a straight stitch for precise top and edge seams so power isn't everything. Cotton broadcloth doesn't need piercing power but 14 oz. denim does. Not sure.

My Pfaff 30 has a 1.4 amp motor and can outsew anything in my fleet except the industrial I just got (and I don't even have that in my home yet because I have to remove the head and motor from the table and take the table apart just to fit it all in my station wagon). I have a 1.2 amp Selectomatic (just checked) that is nowhere near my straight stitch Pfaff 30 or even my 1.3 Pfaff 130s which are rated by some as semi-industrial. The Selectomatic is a cute machine, but that dog just don't hunt.

Selectomatic:



Hah!

Don't get me wrong. I like vintage Brothers. (I actually think their straight stitchers are better than their zig-zags.) But against the 30? Who you kiddin'?
Attached Thumbnails brotherolderselectomatic-640x480-.jpg  
KenmoreRulesAll is offline  
Old 09-17-2014, 09:14 PM
  #19  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Victorian Sweatshop Forum
Posts: 4,096
Default

Not kiddin'. Okay, you're on. Rodney can referee. Mine is newer than yours. And pink. So there.


Cari
Attached Thumbnails brother-210-selectomatic-iv.jpg   s5032086.jpg   reflection-motor-bed.jpg  
Cari-in-Oly is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 06:10 AM
  #20  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Centralia, WA, USA
Posts: 4,890
Default

Hey! How did I get dragged into this?
I'm running away. Now.

A pink Brother just seems wrong somehow.
Rodney
Rodney is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Krystyna
Mission: Organization
54
11-25-2015 02:36 PM
NewsletterBot
Main
47
04-19-2011 10:13 AM
Olivia's Grammy
Pictures
62
01-08-2010 06:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



FREE Quilting Newsletter