Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums >
  • Main
  • For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
  • NOT MINE - but I have the honor of sharing this piece of new history.... >
  • NOT MINE - but I have the honor of sharing this piece of new history....

  • NOT MINE - but I have the honor of sharing this piece of new history....

    Thread Tools
     
    Old 11-03-2015, 09:04 AM
      #1  
    Banned
    Thread Starter
     
    Join Date: Oct 2012
    Location: San Lorenzo, CA
    Posts: 5,361
    Default NOT MINE - but I have the honor of sharing this piece of new history....

    So, when you make friends with folks who deal in the upper rare air of the sewing machine collection world, you have to expect to see some pretty amazing things. I really have seen some pretty amazing machines whose photos were shared with me over the last few years..... Many I was asked not to share because the new owners request it be that way.

    Last night however, I got to see a piece of history and our knowledge of the past change before my eyes.

    In 1851 Singer produced his first working lockstitch sewing machine, the #1
    (mostly meant for commercial sales)

    In 1858 Singer made the Family Machine later known as the "Turtleback" It was the FIRST sewing machine to be sold with an iron treadle base (IVY pattern) and the first intended specifically for the domestic market.

    This machine was not a very good machine. It was expensive and difficult to operate. The legend is (because I cannot currently find documentation to prove it) that Singer knew this and to protect his future reputation, he offered a 100% trade-in value to owners when the new "Letter A" machine came out. Singer tried to collect all of them back and he destroyed them. Melted them down...

    There are 4-5 of these left around the world in museums and there were THREE known to be in private collections.

    Until last night...

    NOW there are 4 in private collectors hands, because this previously not documented machine was just discovered in a mid-west collection and has been already sold (OH SO NOT TO ME) by my friend Mike!!!!

    With permission from Wolfegangs Collectibles:

    A 1858 Singer Family Machine (Turtleback) on Ivy Treadle.
    (Made 5 years BEFORE Singer was incorporated as a company)

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]534828[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]534829[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]534830[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]534831[/ATTACH]

    Just wow..... I hope folks don't mind me sharing this.
    Attached Thumbnails turtleback-102.jpg   turtleback-133.jpg   turtleback-137.jpg   turtleback-140.jpg  
    SteveH is offline  
    Old 11-03-2015, 09:09 AM
      #2  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2012
    Posts: 8,091
    Default

    Oh my, we absolutely want you to share these pics. That might not have been a very good sewing machine, but as an example it's gorgeous.


    Joe
    J Miller is offline  
    Old 11-03-2015, 10:26 AM
      #3  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2013
    Location: Centralia, WA, USA
    Posts: 4,890
    Default

    That's a beautiful machine! The condition is amazing too. I love the stand. It looks like it was a difficult casting to make. I can see why they didn't keep that design long. The machine does look pretty delicate with all the springs on top.
    Singer's return policy made perfect sense from the standpoint of wanting to sell new machines but it is regrettable today.
    Rodney
    Rodney is offline  
    Old 11-03-2015, 10:58 AM
      #4  
    Banned
    Thread Starter
     
    Join Date: Oct 2012
    Location: San Lorenzo, CA
    Posts: 5,361
    Default

    details like:

    the ends of the slide plate... yikes....
    the little wood moldings around the base of the machine Yikes!
    SteveH is offline  
    Old 11-03-2015, 12:14 PM
      #5  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Sep 2015
    Posts: 1,963
    Default

    Sometimes I wish we could have some art nouveau floral cast iron and nice polished wood pieces made in 2015! I just can't see it in relation to my laptop or so called smart phone. Has to be in furniture, garden gate or something. 1858 is even pre art nouveau, a bit of historisism maybe.
    Mickey2 is offline  
    Old 11-03-2015, 12:20 PM
      #6  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Sep 2011
    Location: Washington
    Posts: 4,001
    Default

    What a specimen! Amazing how well it has been kept all of these years. So did it go into a museum? Wonder how this one was missed if it was in someone's collection. Love the pictures, for most of us down in the un rarified air without these cool pictures we would not ever be able to see such a fine piece, thank you for letting us see the pics.
    sewbeadit is offline  
    Old 11-03-2015, 02:52 PM
      #7  
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: Nov 2014
    Location: Sacramento County, CA
    Posts: 302
    Default

    So we started out centered on the needle, sewing front to back. . .wonder why it changed from sewing right to left, on some machines. Very interesting!
    Quincunx is offline  
    Old 11-03-2015, 04:10 PM
      #8  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Aug 2010
    Location: Kentucky - Live in Iowa
    Posts: 1,168
    Default

    I agree with Joe and Rodney. Beautiful! Thanks for sharing!
    aronel is offline  
    Old 11-03-2015, 04:32 PM
      #9  
    Banned
    Thread Starter
     
    Join Date: Oct 2012
    Location: San Lorenzo, CA
    Posts: 5,361
    Default

    Originally Posted by Quincunx
    So we started out centered on the needle, sewing front to back. . .wonder why it changed from sewing right to left, on some machines. Very interesting!

    My research indicates that in the early days folks were striving for differentiation from their competitors. Since no body could say "this is the one true way" they were all trying to find a unique method that would let theirs out sell the competition. By the 1880's they had pretty much settled on what we have today for layout and if you wanted to compete you had to do it the "normal" way.

    In the 1850's - 1870's sewing machines were still considered strange contraptions and the more a customer could look at a machine and feel familiar with it, the less salesmanship was needed to make a sale.

    Companies like Grover & Baker were steadfast in the use of their two unique thread double chainstitch, even though almost no one else did, and it caused their downfall. Singer really figured out quickly that you needed to make custom machines for some uses and common and recognizable machines for most.
    SteveH is offline  
    Old 11-03-2015, 06:09 PM
      #10  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Mar 2011
    Location: Central NJ
    Posts: 5,571
    Default

    WOW! Sorry I can't add anything more than that. Amazing.
    NJ Quilter is offline  
    Related Topics
    Thread
    Thread Starter
    Forum
    Replies
    Last Post
    IzzysGrammie
    Pictures
    176
    05-30-2013 04:42 AM
    salden
    Mission: Organization
    62
    01-08-2013 12:45 PM
    mamaquilts
    General Chit-Chat (non-quilting talk)
    72
    04-28-2012 07:38 PM
    sewsue
    Pictures
    41
    05-30-2010 04:16 AM
    Mominations
    Introduce Yourself
    5
    03-27-2008 08:25 AM

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are Off
    Pingbacks are Off
    Refbacks are Off



    FREE Quilting Newsletter