Ooooh! The suspense is killing me!
07-30-2014, 09:23 AM
#43
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central Willamette Valley, Oregon, USA
Posts: 7,695
07-30-2014, 09:59 AM
#45
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 8,154
well, that's very interesting that the same range of numbers was used for the same model number that many years apart. But that is why you can't always tell from a photo - I'd have never guessed that was a B.
07-30-2014, 10:02 AM
#46
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: San Lorenzo, CA
Posts: 5,361
07-30-2014, 12:51 PM
#48
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 8,154
According to ISMACS, AB349605 from 1926 belongs to a model 127, which is so much different from a 201 that there is no way anyone would mistake one for the other.
AC349605 belongs to a 66 from 1928- so while a lot closer to a 201 than a 127, still quite different
And besides, according to ISMACS list (from Singer) the 201 wasn't made until 1935.
AG349605 from 1942 belongs to a 201, which is the only match we've got.
tracking down serial numbers is rather fun.
BTW - I'm not trying to be snotty. We run into so many people who misidentify their machine because they misread the serial number (or even took one off the motor) and then they are insistant they have a machine that is Model XXX from 18XX -when they really have a model with "from the factory" electric that wasn't in production at that time.
AC349605 belongs to a 66 from 1928- so while a lot closer to a 201 than a 127, still quite different
And besides, according to ISMACS list (from Singer) the 201 wasn't made until 1935.
AG349605 from 1942 belongs to a 201, which is the only match we've got.
tracking down serial numbers is rather fun.
BTW - I'm not trying to be snotty. We run into so many people who misidentify their machine because they misread the serial number (or even took one off the motor) and then they are insistant they have a machine that is Model XXX from 18XX -when they really have a model with "from the factory" electric that wasn't in production at that time.
Last edited by Macybaby; 07-30-2014 at 12:57 PM.
07-30-2014, 01:25 PM
#49
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 8,154
I consider the 201 to be a great machine, that is why I wailed after reading your comments about thinking it was too far gone.
For fun, this is a 127 from the mid 20's, so you can see what I mean by saying they are very, very different looking machines.
For fun, this is a 127 from the mid 20's, so you can see what I mean by saying they are very, very different looking machines.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jim's Gem
Pictures
58
04-04-2009 03:22 PM
